<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelobbyist &#187; Reid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/tag/reid/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My Semi-Random Open Thread on the Health Care Summit</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3049</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3049#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=3049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know this “summit” is a crock, but it’s technically newsworthy, so I am going to be commenting on it throughout the day. I do have other things going on, so it won’t be an every-minute-update thing, but I’ll do what I can. You can watch the crock of a summit at C-SPAN here. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>We all know this “summit” is a crock, but it’s technically  newsworthy, so I am going to be commenting on it throughout the day. I  do have other things going on, so it won’t be an every-minute-update  thing, but I’ll do what I can. You can watch the crock of a summit at  C-SPAN <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.c-span.org/Topics/Health-Care-Insurance-Reform-Legislation-Town-Hall.aspx');" href="http://www.c-span.org/Topics/Health-Care-Insurance-Reform-Legislation-Town-Hall.aspx">here</a>.</p>
<p>A few minutes ago, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) spoke very well  about how reconciliation should be off the table, and quoted Senators  Reid, Obama and Byrd going after reconciliation. Byrd did it last year,  and Reid and Obama did it during the Bush administration. He also noted  that cost should be the primary concern, as lowering cost would bring  higher coverage.</p>
<p>One thing that really ticked me off- President Obama called  Alexander, Reid, Obama House Speaker Pelosi and Senator John McCain by  their first names. What is it with this guy and demeaning those around  him? We all know he’s arrogant- certainly not the only one in summit; as  my father put it, the people in Congress are “certifiably  narcissistic”- but this is just too much. Show a little respect.</p>
<p>10:54- Obama says one of the goals is to see where “we agree” and  disagree, and where we can bridge these differences. See my earlier post  today quoting Major Garrett about how the White House does NOT want to  reconcile Republican and Democratic issues.</p>
<p>10:55- Obama says they should not worry about the process, but just  worry about the substance. So…we shouldn’t worry about reconciliation?  Give me a break.</p>
<p>10:57- Obama quotes the CBO as saying premiums will be lowered by  exchanges. What he ignores…Alexander interrupts him! Obama calls  Alexander a liar- should be an interesting exchange. (This is almost as  exciting as…curling?)</p>
<p>10:59- Obama is quoting the CBO at length. Obama calls Alexander  Lamar again, as Alexander tries to defend his points.</p>
<p>11:00- Obama is still rambling. Will he ever let the bipartisan part  of the summit happen? Yadda, yadda, yadda, we have used every cost  containment out there, yadda, yadda, yadda. Calls Republicans stupid. He  won’t let Alexander get his point across. He wants Alexander to  compliment his bill, because he was too critical before. *Aw…*</p>
<p>11:02- Alexander, RESPECTFULLY disagrees with Obama on the CBO- but  instead of taking advantage of the opening, says other people should  talk first. Oy. Come on, Senator- OOH! McConnell wants Coburn to take  the lead on cost containment. *Chuckles evilly* (For the record,  exaggerated responses are that way on purpose. I’m not really THAT  excited about this stuff.)</p>
<p>11:03- Coburn takes off with a cautionary note. Goes right into a  medical analogy- treating the symptom not the disease. 1/3 of dollars  don’t help people get better or prevent sickness in America. 60% of  American health care is government-directed. Why does it cost so much?  COST is the biggest issue.</p>
<p>11:05- All people will get treated, and will get labeled with a  pre-existing condition. Preventing acute asthma (example) is not well  done in America. How do we lower the cost? 10% of the cost is fraud.  Someone else Coburn quotes says 15%. That’s $150 billion dollars. We  could cut costs by 7.5% tomorrow. A large portion of ordered tests are  because of the lack of tort reform.</p>
<p>11:07- Thompson-Reuters says $625 to over $800 billion of health care  costs annually are wasted. That fits with Dartmouth Atlas numbers of  about 1/3. Coburn talks about philosophical differences. Says we can cut  costs by 15% tomorrow. What would happen to access to health coverage?  It would go up.</p>
<p>11:08- We don’t incentivize prevention. Management of disease is not  encouraged. We encourage bad lawsuits.</p>
<p>11:09- Pay people who do a good job of prevention. Change the food  stamp programs to incentivize, and lunch programs to incentivize, less  diabetes and better health. We create diabetes through school lunch and  food stamp programs. Let’s look at medical malpractice, incentivizing  through states, elimination of fraud- private rate of fraud is 1%- we  haven’t gone where the money is.</p>
<p>11:10- Let’s go after the 1 in 3 dollars. Let’s create rewarding  incentives. Compliments Obama’s bill where it’s good.</p>
<p>11:19- I took a break to talk to my friend RJ, before I fell asleep  watching this. House Majority Leader Hoyer is speaking about how  incentivizing care needs to be done. Talks about the public option and  how it would open up access and competition. He mentions the Donut Hole  in Medicare Part D. He says the House bill covers the Donut Hole. He  also says Americans are watching the summit, which is a laugh.</p>
<p>11:21- Obama calls Senator Baucus and Senator Coburn “Max” and “Tom.”  Demeaning again. He compliments Coburn on cutting fraud and abuse, and  compliments the First Lady on trying to lower obesity.</p>
<p>11:22- Obama tries to sound normal- “hearin’”- before talking about  the public option, and asks to hear the Republican opposition to it. He  says it provides a larger group that will have more “purchasin’ power”  for insurance. He says some Republicans have supported public options in  the past.</p>
<p>11:23- A Republican from Maryland- I didn’t catch his name- talks  about incremental reform and small business. He says half of the  uninsured work for small businesses or depend on someone who does. He  supports small businesses banding together to get the advantages of  larger businesses, which helps by lowering administrative costs, among  other advantages. He says small businesses have been asking for this for  years, and he says this is better than the exchanges.</p>
<p>11:25- Obama is controlling this event very well. Kudos to him, no  kudos to Republicans.</p>
<p>11:26- Senator Baucus say “we are very close” on this. He thinks the  gaps are not that great. *CoughBS* Oh, pardon me.</p>
<p>11:27- Baucus says Democratic bill allows insurance across state  lines and says Secretary of HHS Sebelius is working with states on  lawsuit abuse. Says HSA expansion is not bad, but they don’t help the  poor as much.</p>
<p>I’m done for now- I have stuff to do that’s way more important than  watching this.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Turns out I was an hour behind on all of my  original posts- they are updated to the accurate times.</p>
<p>12:36- HHS Secretary Sebelius is talking about pre-existing  conditions, and says having insurance companies segregating the healthy  and unhealthy is- darn, I forget the exact quote- the worst part of our  health care system. Something like that. I think she’s forgetting about  abortion…</p>
<p>12:38- Rep. Cantor is talking. He is boring, and is doing the  party-line thing about how both sides care, yadda, yadda, yadda. Okay,  here he goes- Republicans and the people don’t care for the Democratic  bill. But he has to get off the talking points. Fast.</p>
<p>12:39- If Washington gets to define benefits, that’s bad. But let’s  assume Washington COULD decide what is most essential well…first- GREAT  job, Cantor, hitting Obama on the lack of a CBO score- there are big  taxes. It will hurt small businesses.</p>
<p>12:41- Cantor quotes the CBO saying the construct of the Senate bill  would cause people to lose insurance. Risky, Cantor- they said those  people would go to the public option, I believe, NOT lose their  insurance.</p>
<p>12:42- Cantor says to start over. The structure we can’t agree on,  but there are areas of agreement.</p>
<p>12:43- Obama mocks Cantor’s change of coverage numbers and compares  them to the huge number of people in the country. Can we do that when he  talks about individual stories that “prove” his point. Now he’s mocking  Cantor more about page numbers. *Yawn*</p>
<p>12:44- He is now comparing meat inspectors and food cost to health  insurance. Drug prices, same thing. We already have way too many  regulations, Mr. President, on health care. (Barack?)</p>
<p>12:45- Obama says Republicans don’t believe in getting rid of  regulations- darn, he’s back to the individual stories- now he says  Republicans agree with him on having regulations. He keeps talking about  insurance reform, NOT health CARE reform. Big difference.</p>
<p>12:47- He called Sebelius Kathleen…oy. He talks about the page  numbers so much, my goodness.</p>
<p>Done again. I can’t stand this anymore. My afternoon meeting was  canceled last-minute, so I’m watching “Gladiator.” I’ve never seen it  before. (Republicans are letting Obama dominate this too much, anyway.  They need to hammer him on abortion, the CBO non-scoring, etc. COME ON,  people.)</p>
<p>12:50- Ooh, Cantor is talking about how we can’t afford this, it’s  not a perfect world and we should go step-by-step. Good for him. He says  to set aside the mandate, and go back to things we can agree on.</p>
<p>12:51- VP Biden is making a stupid argument- he says either have  government or don’t. NO MIDDLE GROUND. What a moron.</p>
<p>12:51- Cantor vs. Obama is good, actually- he has Obama stuttering  and pausing and avoiding questions.</p>
<p>Back to the movie…</p>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Gladiator is overrated. Back to the health  care “summit.”</p>
<p>2:33- Rep. Marsha Blackburn is talking about Anthem raising costs-  and talking about interstate insurance buying. She must have read what I  posted yesterday on Daily Caller.</p>
<p>2:34- “Care delayed” and…options?…delayed are care and options  delayed. Something like that. Really good. State legislatures and  governors should be given more control.</p>
<p>2:35- He called her Marsha. AUGH! Now he is agreeing with interstate  insurance purchasing.</p>
<p>2:36- Obama is saying the unemployed are leaving insurance because of  costs. He’s right. This, as he is explaining, causes those who need  insurance to keep it at more cost. The answer, he says, is to broaden  the pool. How about getting people JOBS?</p>
<p>2:37- Bridge the gap- national exchange with minimum standards.</p>
<p>2:38- He used to be against the mandate- now he’s for it. (He said  “sayin’”- really pushing that average person thing, huh?) Independent  economists support something he is talking about…unnamed, of course.  Shall we take his word for it?</p>
<p>2:40- STOP CALLING PEOPLE BY FIRST NAME!</p>
<p>2:40- Blackburn is responding- she says Obama wants to let (he just  interrupted her) companies in, she wants to let people out. He is so  rude.</p>
<p>2:41- Stop talking and let her talk. You rude man. He just said “I  want to finish this, guys” when BLACKBURN, a woman, tried to finish.  Come on, great communicator. Get the gender right, at least.</p>
<p>2:41- He didn’t let her finish. He moved on. What a tool.</p>
<p>2:42- He called Biden “Joe.” Now Biden is talking about the impact on  the deficit. He admits to not knowing what Americans want- he’s been in  DC too long. How about polls, town halls and voting?</p>
<p>2:43- Comparing this debate to Social Security mandates. Both are  immoral. Plain and simple. (My take, not Biden’s.) Biden almost swore.  *Chuckle*</p>
<p>2:44- “We all agree” that costs have doubled in a decade, costs have  huge waste, and America has the best doctors. Biden needs to be quiet  now- he’s yakking randomly. He is all over the place. He sounds like  Olbermann.</p>
<p>2:45- CBO has scored the various plans regarding bending the cost  curve, says Biden. He says the Senate bill cuts costs, but it does not.  He is forgetting that the CBO looked at ten years to 2019, but  expenditures only go out from 2013, so the calculations are wrong. Not  CBO’s fault- it’s the fault of the people in DC. What a bunch of  narcissistic buffoons, almost all of them.</p>
<p>2:47- He hasn’t breathed in three minutes. Be quiet, Biden.</p>
<p>2:48- He is still talking- but he is talking about not overpaying  insurance companies in Medicare Advantage and getting rid of waste. WHAT  ABOUT PAYMENT REFORM? That’s the biggest issue. Biden is still talking.  Oy. His voice is almost as annoying as Obama’s…</p>
<p>2:49- He said he wants to make another point…but he hasn’t made one  yet. He says he wants to bend the cost curve- no, really? WOW! Does he  say anything of substance?</p>
<p>2:50- Rep. Ryan is starting off strong. Go Ryan! He is now quoting  Obama as saying he won’t sign a single dollar to the deficit, and says  no CBO score for the Obama bill, but compares it to the Senate bill. He  says it will not lower the deficit, and is now going through it. GO  RYAN!</p>
<p>2:52- Gimmicks and smoke and mirrors- GO RYAN! He says the bill costs  $2.3 trillion, not the less than $1 trillion Obama claims. Now he is  going through, line-by-line, and is citing that part of the bill is a  Ponzi scheme.</p>
<p>2:53- He says the bill cuts Medicare to make new program, not help  Medicare. Says the chief actuary of Medicare says businesses will go  under, and it will hurt people. According to Ryan, cutting out the  gimmicks, it’s a huge deficit, and the most cynical gimmick is leaving  the Doc Fix out. YAY! GO RYAN! WOO-HOO!</p>
<p>2:54- “Hiding spending does not reduce spending.” Where is the cost  curve going? It’s going up, says the Medicare actuary.</p>
<p>2:55- “We agree the status quo is unsustainable.” This is not the  answer, and the analysis we get proves that. Ryan says “we represent”  the people, and if Biden does not know what they think, he’s not  listening to what the people are saying.</p>
<p>2:56- Obama is stu-stutt-stuttering…again. <img src="http://race42008.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif" alt=":o" /> )</p>
<p>2:57- “Your side,” Obama? What about post-partisanship?</p>
<p>2:58- Obama is talking about Medicare Advantage. No comment, as I  don’t know enough about it to say anything.</p>
<p>2:59- Ryan looks very composed, and unlike Obama kind of confident  and relaxed.</p>
<p>3:00- Senator McCain is saying why should Florida be a special case  about Medicare dollars? HAHAHAHAHA! Go McCain.</p>
<p>3:01- Coburn is saying do we want to leave more debt for our kids?  Seniors don’t want that. (Oh, no- now he is talking about Oklahoma.  Don’t do that. Stay on the nation…) Say we are broke, Medicare is broke,  let’s not add new benefits, and let’s make sure current benefits are  spread more fairly.</p>
<p>3:02- Obama seems to be confident about Medicare Advantage, or  rather, his take on it being bad for 80% of seniors. DON’T CALL COBURN  TOM! Call him “Dr.” or “Senator” or something respectful.</p>
<p>3:03- Obama said “previous Congress on Medicare Advantage,” but it  happened under the previous administration, NOT the Congress. He  apologizes for breaking decorum…but he keeps doing it. Over and over.</p>
<p>3:04- Rep. Becerra is saying there needs to be a referee on the  field. Do we believe CBO or not? Good point. He’s hammering Ryan-  gentlemanly- for supporting CBO over the years and is now saying they  are wrong.</p>
<p>3:05- Ryan is interrupting. Good for him. He’s now clarifying-  Becerra is finishing. He is doing well, but he is manipulating what Ryan  said. Becerra is quoting CBO regarding deficit, and is saying they say  the bills will lower deficit in the second decade.</p>
<p>3:06- Becerra is talking about overutilization. Good. He at least  recognizes the issue exists.</p>
<p>3:07- My prediction…Obama won’t let Ryan respond to Becerra’s  manipulation of what Ryan said. Watch. I’ll be right.</p>
<p>3:08- Follow-throughs on care. Becerra knows his stuff. Yup.  Coordination of care will lower costs dramatically. He is right. Let  Ryan speak, though. You can do it…</p>
<p>3:09- Darn…they didn’t let Ryan talk. McConnell didn’t let him talk.  Darn. Senator Grassley is reading the statute for Medicare Advantage. He  needs to stop talking now. Let Ryan talk. Please. I ask you, Senator…</p>
<p>3:10- Grassley is reading some letter. LET RYAN TALK! Grassley has an  awful voice for this stuff. He also is not a dynamic thinker, and  sounds like a partisan hack. (Obama called him “Chuck.”)</p>
<p>3:11- He sounds like Biden. Oy…</p>
<p>3:13- Grassley needs to stop talking. Now. Let Ryan talk. Now. Be  quiet. Please…Ooh, never mind. He’s going after the mandate…never mind.  He’s going on a rant now about grassroots.</p>
<p>3:14- Grassley needs to stop talking. He needs to retire. Stay on  focus, man. Come on. Don’t talk about your state, you sound like a  buffoon.</p>
<p>3:15- Good point- no cuts will happen, as hospitals will close. CBO  grades what’s in front of them versus the reality of future Congresses.  He’s right, but could have said it much more succinctly. Now he keeps  being a buffoon, and says he learned about health care last year. He  sounds like a buffoon.</p>
<p>3:16- Obama is talking about hard decisions- we’re in big trouble if  nobody will make those decisions. He’s right. Which is why DC needs to  be taken over by people who aren’t politicians, and are business people  and not DC-ers.</p>
<p>3:17- But…but…SPEAK, Mr. President. You can do it. Ooh, hitting  insurance companies for making a lot of money. True? I don’t know.  Average is 3%. I don’t know about Medicare Advantage.</p>
<p>3:18- Grassley is taking 30 seconds to respond- he’s doing well thus  far. He is saying the cuts won’t happen. He’s right.</p>
<p>3:19- Obama is saying MA (Medicare Advantage) is going to insurance  companies. He called Senator Conrad “Kent.”</p>
<p>3:20- This should be interesting. Conrad is a smart, effective  moderate Democrat. Medicare is going to go broke in eight years.</p>
<p>3:20- Do we want to endanger benefits for Medicare recipients? If so,  do nothing. Period. So, together, we can work together. Coburn left?  What? Darn.</p>
<p>3:21- Let’s look at those who are chronically ill. 5% of Medicare  beneficiaries use 50% of the Medicare dollars. Chronically ill people.  Multiple serious illnesses. He commends Coburn regarding care and  coordination of care. He’s right. Right on, Senator Conrad.</p>
<p>3:22- A study of 20,000 chronically ill people- 16 kinds of pills on  average, they cut out eight. Thousands of dollars were saved. Coburn’s  back. YAY! I think Conrad is referencing Dartmouth Atlas.</p>
<p>3:23- A doctor told Conrad that uncoordinated care was being caused,  for Conrad’s deceased father-in-law, by chaos. We have a system that is  chaotic. It is characterized by chaos. He’s right.</p>
<p>3:24- He prays we come together to work on this stuff. Obama called  Beohner John…Beohner agrees with Obama’s premise of why the meeting  happened- so he agrees with Obama’s lie? Come on, Leader Beohner.  Please…</p>
<p>3:25- Ooh, he mocked Obama. “Let me explain why” people want health  care reform to start over.</p>
<p>3:26- We are talking about “A new entitlement program that will  bankrupt our country.” A dangerous experiment? We may have problems, but  we have the best health care system in the world. He is using talking  points, not policy. LET RYAN TALK!</p>
<p>3:27- $500 billion in new taxes in the bill he brought with him, as  well as major Medicare cuts. We need to find savings, and use those $ to  keep Medicare going. That was already said, Beohner. Move on. Okay,  individual and employer mandates are bad. Good, keep going. Wal-Mart  likes the mandate, because it can afford it but competitors can’t. (This  last part is me, not Beohner.)</p>
<p>3:29- GO BEOHNER! Abortion! All right! Punch him in the kidneys! GO  GO GO! WOO-HOO! President’s bill allows federal funding of abortion.  Let’s start over, Obama. Let’s do a step-by-step approach. Bring costs  down, expand access. Beohner is saying why can’t we agree on tort  reform, medical malpractice, insurance buying between states, etc.?</p>
<p>3:30- Obama is now avoiding responsibility. Again. Calls Beohner a  liar. He won’t go after agreement because…huh? I don’t get it.</p>
<p>3:31- He wants to stay on certain points, and now wants Jim Cooper to  speak.</p>
<p>3:32- Rep. Cooper is a Blue Dog. This should be interesting. He  quoted Ryan, and is now supporting competition about cutting deficits,  and is saying let’s vote how we talk, when the cameras are gone. He is  supporting McCain, Ryan and Coburn. Talk tough, but not vote tough, this  is not good enough because of the costs. This is not good enough.</p>
<p>3:33- Conrad-Gregg bill for commission was voted down. He is right to  blame Republicans for switching sides, but the commission is not a good  way to address the deficit. It lets Congress avoid its responsibility.  (My take.)</p>
<p>3:34- Our fiscal problem stinks. Badly. Really badly.</p>
<p>3:35- Tough votes aren’t there. Goes after Republicans for Medicare  Advantage costs, and he’s right. Nobody’s hands are clean on our debt.  Go for more savings if you don’t like the current bills. The American  people will be watching after the cameras are done.</p>
<p>3:36- McCain is speaking- says to start over on the bill. Special  deals are bad, and they are more than offensive. Medical malpractice  reform. McCain is talking about California and Texas with malpractice  reform. (What about Mississippi? They have a good one.) Lawsuit filings  are down, defensive medicine increases costs by 10%. Recruitment for  physicians is up. Licenses are up. (McCain knows his numbers.) 35%  premium slashes by largest malpractice insurance company. All we have to  do is enact this into legislation. BAM! Go McCain!</p>
<p>3:39- He is going after Reid for reconciliation. McCain has traction  here, as he helped stop the reconciliation modification a few years ago.  He is defending the filibuster, and says if reconciliation is done on  an issue of this magnitude, it would harm the country and the  institution (the Senate, I assume).</p>
<p>3:40- Obama wants to use reconciliation. YES WE ARE INTERESTED, YOU  MORON! We want a vote. Not the reconciliation vote. He doesn’t know  America at all.</p>
<p>3:41- Obama fairly goes after Beohner for being wrong on claiming  tort reform as the biggest deal in health care reform. He says he cares  about it, but only put a (relatively) tiny amount of money, $20 million,  last year after his September speech.</p>
<p>3:42- Obama compliments Coburn on incentivizing states on medical  malpractice reform. He says there is a contradiction with Republicans on  respecting states in some ways. (Abortion? Who knows?)</p>
<p>I’m done for the day, everyone. Have a good one. I hope I was able to  help.</p>
<p>3:44- Okay, never mind. I’m staying- Senator Durbin is right. Tort  reform is not as big as Republicans say it is.</p>
<p>Now I’m bored. Bye.</p>
<p>Originally posted at <a href="http://race42008.com/2010/02/25/health-care-summit-open-thread/#comments">www.race42012.com</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3049/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Fail</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2711</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balloon Boy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Enquirer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember Tiger Woods and his many sordid affairs? The media ate that up. It only took two weeks for our media sources to have &#8220;investigated,&#8221; found him guilty and hung him out to dry. Meanwhile, it has taken months for the media to &#8220;officially&#8221; report that former senator and presidential candidate John Edwards had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Tiger Woods and his many sordid affairs? The media <a href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2195">ate that up</a>. It only took two weeks for our media sources to have &#8220;investigated,&#8221; found him guilty and hung him out to dry. Meanwhile, it has taken months for the media to &#8220;<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31781.html">officially</a>&#8221; report that former senator and presidential candidate John Edwards had a child out of wedlock, denied it&#8230;and did both while a major candidate in the 2008 race. Too, remember that it was the <em>National Enquirer </em>that broke the Edwards story wide open. The <em><strong>NATIONAL ENQUIRER</strong></em>. Not <em>The New York Times</em>, which had <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/18/us/politics/18cindy.html?_r=3&amp;th&amp;emc=th&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">this</a> profile about Cindy McCain in 2008, or the <em>Washington Post</em>, which had a front-page story about <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/29/AR2009082902434.html">Governor McDonnell&#8217;s thesis</a> from two decades or even Drudge, which only last week had a picture of Senate Majority Reid (D-NV) and a story about his alleged facelift as the leading story.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve <a href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2660">said it before</a> and I&#8217;ll say it again- our professional media has failed us. However, in the age of the Internet, we have zero excuses. Let&#8217;s hold the professional media responsible by using the free market choices we have via the Internet, TV, newspapers, radio and magazines to show them Michael Jackson, facelifts, the Balloon Boy and other non-stories won&#8217;t cut it anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2711/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Holding Democrats Accountable on Transparency</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2626</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2626#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-Span]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[November]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Foundry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last few weeks, there has been talk of not having the traditional &#8220;conference&#8221; to meld the Senate and House health care reform bills. I laughed off such thoughts, as transparency is something this administration and congressional leaders have been hammered for over the last several months. However, it appears I was wrong. Senate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the last few weeks, there has been talk of not having the traditional &#8220;conference&#8221; to meld the Senate and House health care reform bills. I laughed off such thoughts, as transparency is something this administration and congressional leaders have been hammered for over the last several months. However, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/1/4/821742/-Congress-looks-to-avoid-conference-on-health-insurance-reform">it appears</a> I <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-treatment/exclusive-dems-almost-certain-bypass-conference">was wrong</a>. Senate Majority Leader Reid (D-NV) and House Majority Leader Pelosi (D-CA) are setting things up so they will not have to have the conference, and instead get the &#8220;conference&#8221; bill without a conference.</p>
<p>This is bothersome. However, a number of media sources are doing their job and calling for the Obama administration to <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2010/01/05/knock-knock-whos-there-its-c-span-mr-president/#more-22784?">open the melding process to the public</a>. (H/T to The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://blog.heritage.org/">The Foundry</a>.&#8221;) Let&#8217;s make our voices heard in support of C-Span&#8217;s efforts and make certain Democrats know they should have full transparency in this debate or face the wrath of the voters come November.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2626/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid&#8217;s Bill Could be the End of Private Insurance</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2576</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2576#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sam theodosopoulos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrumForum.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ObamaCare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sam theodosopoulos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following was originally published and is the sole property of FrumForum.com The left blogosphere is denouncing Obamacare as a triumph for private insurers. But Robert Book of the Heritage Foundation argues that it is much more plausible the operations of the plan will extinguish the private insurance industry. The Senate bill would force private [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following was <a href="http://www.frumforum.com/reids-bill-could-be-the-end-of-private-insurance">originally published and is the sole property of</a> FrumForum.com</p>
<blockquote><p>The left blogosphere is denouncing Obamacare as a triumph for private insurers. But Robert Book of the Heritage Foundation <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/23/could-the-senate-bill-eliminate-private-insurance/" target="_blank">argues</a> that it is much more plausible the operations of the plan will extinguish the private insurance industry.</p>
<p>The Senate bill would force private plans to spend a minimum amount on paying medical claims and tax excessive premiums.? The tax on those premiums however would not count towards the limits.</p>
<p>As Robert Book explains:</p>
<blockquote><p>It would be very easy for regulators to become to develop a plan ?with a minimum benefit package that is high enough (say, above $8972 in average claims) that makes it literally impossible for health plans to break even, let alone make a profit.</p></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Sam K. Theodosopoulos is the Editor of the GW YAF Blog.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2576/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

