<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelobbyist &#187; Race42012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/tag/race42012/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney Wins NH Straw Poll: Duh&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/4081</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/4081#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rj caster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race42012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Straw Poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=4081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poll sponsored by ABC News and WMUR was released yesterday showing Former Governor Mitt Romney with a commanding lead over all of the other Republican Presidential candidates for 2012.  Our friends over at Race42012 posted the numbers: Mitt Romney 35% Ron Paul 11% Tim Pawlenty 8% Sarah Palin 7% Michele Bachmann 5% Jim DeMint [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A poll sponsored by <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2011/01/romney-wins-new-hampshire-republican-party-committee-straw-poll.html" target="_blank">ABC News and WMUR was released yesterday</a> showing Former Governor Mitt Romney with a commanding lead over all of the other Republican Presidential candidates for 2012.  Our friends over at <a href="http://race42012.com/2011/01/22/new-hampshire-straw-poll/" target="_blank">Race42012 posted the numbers</a>:</p>
<p>Mitt Romney	 35%<br />
Ron Paul	 11%<br />
Tim Pawlenty	 8%<br />
Sarah Palin	 7%<br />
Michele Bachmann 5%<br />
Jim DeMint	 5%<br />
Herman Cain	 34%<br />
Chris Christie	 3%<br />
Rick Santorum	 3%<br />
Mitch Daniels	 3%<br />
Newt Gingrich	 3%<br />
Mike Huckabee	 3%<br />
Mike Pence	 3%<br />
Rudy Giuliani	 2%<br />
Judd Gregg	 2%<br />
Gary Johnson	 2%<br />
Other	 2%<br />
Donald Trump	 1%<br />
Haley Barbour	 1%<br />
Jon Huntsman	 0%<br />
John Thune	 0%</p>
<p>There are 169 comments over at Race42012 about this poll.  I don&#8217;t think anyone can really be surprised that Mitt Romney did so well;  he <em>was</em> Governor of Massachusetts and this <em>is</em> New Hampshire that we are talking about.  Perhaps we can get our resident New Hampshire&#8230;ian? to shed some light on what he takes out of these numbers.  I for one know I am asking the question on everyone&#8217;s mind&#8230; where was <a href="http://draftliz.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Liz Cheney</a>?</p>
<p>-rj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/4081/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Rid of Napolitano</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2530</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2530#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amsterdam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Homeland Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Goldberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NY Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race42012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gibbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Think Progress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As is well-known by now, last week there was a suicide bomber attack on a plane from Amsterdam to Detroit. The attack, fortunately, failed, as the explosive device failed to go off. The alleged terrorist is suspected to be connected to at least one terrorist organization. He claimed, initially at least, to be connected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is well-known by now, last week there was a suicide bomber attack on a plane from <span><span>Amsterdam to Detroit. The attack, fortunately, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_airliner_disturbance">failed</a>, as the explosive device <a href="http://cbs3.com/topstories/delta.plane.fire.2.1391114.html">failed to go off</a>.</span></span> The alleged terrorist is suspected to be connected to <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1238688/Al-Qaeda-terror-born-Africa.html">at least one terrorist organization</a>. He claimed, initially at least, <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/25/breaking-attempted-terrorist-attack-on-intl-northwest-flight/">to be connected to Al Qaeda</a>.</p>
<p>This, obviously, is both good news and bad. First, it&#8217;s good in that nobody died, a terrorist was captured and now we know where to concentrate <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BR0KU20091228">more efforts</a> on the international scale. The bad news is that some people are just plain stupid, including Think Progress&#8217; Matthew Yglesias, who <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/12/not-so-scary-terror.php">wrote the other day</a> that, &#8220;Ultimately, it does no favors to anyone to blow this sort of thing out of proportion. The United States could not, of course, be ?devastated? by anything resembling this scheme. We ought to be clear on that fact. We want to send the message around the world that this sort of vile attempt to slaughter innocent people is not, at the end of the day, anything resembling a serious challenge to American power. It?s attempted murder, it?s wrong, we should try to stop it, but it?s really not much more than that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even worse, however, is <a href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/12/28/heckuva-job-janet/">the reaction</a> from Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano. &#8220;<a href="http://race42008.com/2009/12/27/napolitano-the-system-worked/">The system worked</a>,&#8221; according to Napolitano. Given that it took a failed attempt <em>plus </em>civilian passengers to subdue the attempted terrorist, I&#8217;d say the system failed. Plus, the guy was on a watch list, which is particularly poignant given <a href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/12/27/poll-the-system-worked/">his father reported him</a> as a potential threat two years ago. (See the video of Napolitano&#8217;s inane comments <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2009/12/27/napolitano_on_failed_terror_attempt_the_system_worked.html">here</a>.)</p>
<p>To <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTY0Y2E2NWQ3Nzc2MjYzMWMwOGJlNzE2NDVlMGUwZjM=">quote</a> Jonah Goldberg from The Corner yesterday, &#8220;If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patenly unqualified hack.&#8221; Personally, I think &#8220;man-caused disasters&#8221; are a worse threat than <a href="http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/michellemalkin.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/hsa-rightwing-extremism-09-04-07.pdf">conservatives</a>, Secretary Napolitano. You had better figure that out soon, or your job will be gone. Unfortunately, this will probably not happen until after Americans have died as a result of your incompetence. Yes, as they said on the Real Clear Politics blog, it&#8217;s your job to reassure the American public as part of an overall security standpoint. However- and I&#8217;ll finish with a quote from the <a href="http://realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com/2009/12/28/heckuva-job-janet/">RCP blog</a>- &#8220;&#8230;she should be smart enough to find a way of doing that without treating the American people like a bunch of morons and dupes.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was originally posted at <a href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2530">THE LOBBYIST</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> According to <em>The Washington Monthly </em>blog, President Obama has been paying <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2009_12/021642.php">close attention</a> to the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/24/AR2009122400536.html">Al Qaeda threat</a> from Yemen. Kudos to President Obama for doing so.</p>
<p><strong>Update II:</strong> The Heritage Foundation&#8217;s <em>Morning Bell</em> <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/12/28/morning-bell-the-system-failed/?utm_source=Newsletter&amp;utm_medium=Email&amp;utm_campaign=Morning%2BBell">points out the continued failure</a> by the Obama administration to take the proper steps to protect this country from terrorists, and offers three steps going forward.</p>
<p><strong>Update III: </strong>A friend pointed out on Facebook that I misspelled Secretary Napolitano&#8217;s name- it is corrected.</p>
<p><strong>Update IIII (last one, I hope):</strong> Two links from where I posted this at <a href="http://race42008.com/2009/12/28/get-rid-of-napolatino/#comments">Race42012</a> showing Secretary Napolitano backtracking on her statements about the system working well. Too little, too late, I think.</p>
<p>TODAY Video: Napolitano: Prevention system ?failed miserably?<br />
<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34608370#34608370');" rel="nofollow" href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34608370#34608370">http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/26184891/vp/34608370#34608370</a></p>
<p>Security System Failed, Napolitano Acknowledges<br />
<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nytimes.com/2009/12/29/us/29terror.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print');" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/29/us/29terror.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/29/us/29terror.html?_r=1&amp;pagewanted=print</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2530/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

