<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelobbyist &#187; DC School Voucher Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/tag/dc-school-voucher-program/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughts on the State of the Union Speech</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2752</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2752#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 14:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC School Voucher Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discretionary spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don’t Ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don’t Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outsource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Thoughts on the State of the Union Speech The transcript of President Obama’s speech can be found here. Any quotes below from the speech are found in the transcript. 1. I missed the first few minutes of the speech. Did he do the traditional shout-out to members of the audience? I thought I saw [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 id="post-26682"><a title="Permanent Link to Some Thoughts on the State of  the Union Speech" rel="bookmark" href="http://race42008.com/2010/01/28/some-thoughts-on-the-state-of-the-union-speech/">Some Thoughts on the State of the Union Speech</a></h3>
<div>
<p>The transcript of President Obama’s speech can be found <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/should-conservatives-get-behind-obamas-spending-freeze/');" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/should-conservatives-get-behind-obamas-spending-freeze/">here</a>.  Any quotes below from the speech are found in the transcript.</p>
<p>1. I missed the first few minutes of the speech. Did he do the  traditional shout-out to members of the audience? I thought I saw the  two Fort Hood heroes next to First Lady Obama. (According to the  transcript, he did not do it in the beginning of the speech, and I don’t  remember it happening at any other time.)</p>
<p>2. He wants to help grow America’s economy by raising taxes on those  who outsource. On the one hand, he’s rewarding those who stay. However,  without other incentives to stay- such as a <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.forbes.com/2009/03/09/flat-tax-plan-obama-opinions-columnists-taxes.html');" href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/03/09/flat-tax-plan-obama-opinions-columnists-taxes.html">practical  tax structure</a>- he is asking/telling them to stay out of fear, not  out of the dynamic opportunities America offers businesses. This is  equivalent to punching someone in the nose who leaves, and telling the  rest you’ll not punch them in the face. Thus, you are doing them a  favor, or so it appears. Unfortunately for America, business leaders  generally aren’t stupid, and they will leave the country completely or  simply find a way around the laws.</p>
<p>3. He promised to pay more money for education, more money for  community banks to lend- the latter, mind you, out of what the big banks  and lending institutions have paid back to the taxpayer- to spend money  on green initiatives and to balance out the massive spending increases  the Democratic Congress has put on this country in the last twelve  months. How would he balance these seemingly contradictory proposals? By  freezing <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/should-conservatives-get-behind-obamas-spending-freeze/');" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2010/01/26/should-conservatives-get-behind-obamas-spending-freeze/">discretionary  spending for three years</a> and “not continu[ing] tax cuts for oil  companies, for investment fund managers, and for those making over  $250,000 a year.” For fun, let’s see how much he cuts from trial lawyers  (<a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/hotair.com/archives/2009/10/10/cbo-tort-reform-would-save-54-billion-to-the-deficit/');" href="http://hotair.com/archives/2009/10/10/cbo-tort-reform-would-save-54-billion-to-the-deficit/">huge  Democratic supporters</a>) and see how much he raises on those making  less than $250,000, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979POSG0&amp;show_article=1');" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979POSG0&amp;show_article=1">as  he did last year</a>, breaking a campaign promise. Too, freezing  discretionary is to freeze only about <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979POSG0&amp;show_article=1');" href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979POSG0&amp;show_article=1">18%  of the budget</a>, and he is only targeting $25 billion, a relatively  paltry amount. According to MarketWatch, <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-to-propose-three-year-budget-freeze-wsj-2010-01-25-202370?reflink=MW_news_stmp');" href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-to-propose-three-year-budget-freeze-wsj-2010-01-25-202370?reflink=MW_news_stmp">non-military  discretionary spending is about $447 billion.</a> Doing the math, we  see he is supporting freezing about 1/18th of the discretionary budget,  or approximately 5.5%. I am definitely not complaining about the effort,  but why is he pretending it’s going to be enough to pay for the new  programs and monies he and the Democrats have saddled us with this past  year? Perhaps if he were to support real efforts to cut back spending as  supported by <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704509704575019504062222376.html');" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704509704575019504062222376.html">Senator  Coburn (R-OK)</a> and <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.heritage.org/research/budget/wm2472.cfm');" href="http://www.heritage.org/research/budget/wm2472.cfm">Brian Riedl</a> of The Heritage Foundation, we could begin the long road back to fiscal  sanity.</p>
<p>4. He said “health insurance reform” again, not health care reform.</p>
<p>5. He called for the lifting of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. *Big Yawn*  While I have yet to see enough evidence to support lifting DADT, it’s  right around the 80th issue back on the list. Too, I think he announced  his support for lifting it to get the same kind of energy from the base  President Bush was looking for when he called for the Federal Amendment  banning gay marriage in his 2006 State of the Union speech. Gays are  increasingly incensed with the president, so he had to throw them <em>something</em>.  After all, they put thousands of hours and millions of dollars towards  his election, and he has pretty much ignored them since that happened,  except for some of the requisite events to re-ingratiate himself with  them. I don’t see, however, DADT being lifted in the next few months,  what with re-election the major concern of most Democrats.</p>
<p>6. He supported nuclear power and offshore drilling. Yes, he still  wants cap-and-trade (which won’t happen in an already-tough election  year for Democrats), but supporting nuclear power and drilling was one  of the few bipartisan ideas he offered, and I was both surprised and  glad he supports them.</p>
<p>7. Actually, this might be the Lie of the Day: “That’s the leadership  we are providing: engagement that advances the  common security and  prosperity of all people.” Given that he was ridiculed by France’s  Sarkozy for being soft on Iran, ignored the protesters who were dying in  Iran for quite some time, did not support the legal coup by the  Honduran people and their government and military, snubbed Germany’s  Merkel at the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, snubbed  Britain’s Prime Minister and Queen once each and broke a missile shield  contract with Poland, how can he say he is using engagement that  advances the common security and prosperity of all people?</p>
<p>8. I was surprised at the enthusiasm and wide-ranging efforts he  talked about. I thought he would be both more mild and more cognizant of  the fact that his policies are unpopular and Congress is not going to  take political risks right now. Will he convince politicians to be more  concerned about the state of the country versus their own survival? I  expect Democrats will make some noise in that area, then blame their  opponents for not wanting to work together and thus continue this  ridiculous and harmful cycle of politics we have in DC.</p>
<p>9. Chuckle of the Day: He wants people to stop campaigning and lead  in Washington. Because, you know, he stopped campaigning on November 5,  2009. (As Jonah Goldberg <a onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.nypost.com/p/news/national/obama_answer_for_america_more_of_1IboSZ3t6WFW12qZnpv10J');" href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/obama_answer_for_america_more_of_1IboSZ3t6WFW12qZnpv10J">noted  today</a>, the president brought back his old campaign manager this  week to retool his message. You know, because he’s stopped campaigning.)</p>
<p>10. For all his talk about education, he still has not supported the  DC School Voucher program.</p>
<p>11. Last but not least, his “jobs will,” or third stimulus in the  last two years, not only won’t do anything positive but will coincide  with the current stimulus, only $172 billion of which has been spent.  Since we have $600 billion still to utilize, why not use that first  before putting more debt on us?</p>
<p>12. Enough with the SOB stories. Please. Use  evidence to convince us, not a story about adding 1,200 jobs, because  most Americans know at least 1,201 were lost at the same time these  1,200 were brought into play. Please? Treat us like adults, not  starry-eyed children. THEN you will be a president we might be able to  follow.</p>
<p>*This was originally published at <a href="http://race42008.com/2010/01/28/some-thoughts-on-the-state-of-the-union-speech/">Race42012.com</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2752/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heritage Foundation Holds Event for DC School Voucher Program</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1774</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1774#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dustin Siggins</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DC School Voucher Program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Let Me Rise]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, The Heritage Foundation blog?advertised its new video, &#8220;Let Me Rise.&#8221; The video, described as &#8220;a 30-minute film about the school choice debate in our nation?s capital and around the country,&#8221; will continue the fight for school choice that teachers unions are so against, and that our nation&#8217;s children so desperately need. In particular danger [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/19/let-me-rise/#more-17432">The Heritage Foundation blog</a>?advertised its new video, &#8220;Let Me Rise.&#8221; The video, described as &#8220;a 30-minute film about the school choice debate in our nation?s capital and around the country,&#8221; will continue the fight for school choice that teachers unions are so against, and that our nation&#8217;s children so desperately need. In particular danger right now is the DC School Voucher Program, which for a fraction of the normal cost of a DC public education ($7,500) students are put through an educational system that is safer for them, gives them a better education and <a href="http://www.newmajority.com/annoy-the-teachers-unions-reinstate-dc-school-vouchers#">saves the public millions of dollars</a>. Unfortunately, most Democrats are so beholden to teachers unions they are trying to shut the program down.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the kicker: the students are mostly minorities. I thought Democrats wanted to bring minorities up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1774/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

