<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelobbyist &#187; Conservatism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/tag/conservatism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 16:20:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voters Now Trust Republicans Most</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3876</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3876#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>allie duzett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allie Winegar Duzett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rassmussen Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=3876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This has nothing to do with what&#8217;s going on at AFP, sort of&#8211;but it now appears as though voters trust Republicans more than Democrats on all ten of the key issues Rasmussen Reports tracks. Click on the link to see the full breakdown.  Not every lead is statistically significant, but it should give us hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has nothing to do with what&#8217;s going on at AFP, sort of&#8211;but it now appears as though <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues">voters trust Republicans</a> more than Democrats on all ten of the key issues Rasmussen Reports tracks. Click on the link to see the full breakdown.  Not every lead is statistically significant, but it should give us hope nonetheless!*</p>
<p>From the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Incumbent members of Congress don’t exactly get a vote of confidence from their constituents. Just 27% of voters think their representative in Congress is the <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/november_2009/33_say_their_representative_in_congress_is_best_person_for_job" target="_self">best possible person for the job</a>, down six points from November of last year. Only 37% believe their local congressional representative deserves reelection, compared to 42% who felt that way way last fall.</p>
<p>Sixty percent (60%) of voters say most members of Congress <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/august_2010/60_of_voters_say_most_in_congress_don_t_care_what_they_think" target="_blank">don’t care what their constituents think</a>. Most voters continue to believe it would be <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/june_2010/65_say_country_better_off_if_most_in_congress_defeated_this_november" target="_self">better for the country if the majority of Congress is thrown out this November,</a> but they also remain unconvinced that a Republican takeover will make a noticeable difference.</p></blockquote>
<p>Now we can all just cross our fingers and hope that the 60% of voters who think their Congressman doesn&#8217;t care actually vote out their dud Congressman come November.</p>
<p><em>*</em>I swear I&#8217;m not a fan of the Republican Party&#8211;but I think we can mostly agree that the Republican Party is better than the alternative.</p>
<p><em>Allie Winegar Duzett is the author of <a href="http://tinyurl.com/36wmu56">How to Save America: A Tactical Guide for Practical Patriots</a>.  Find her on <a href="http://twitter.com/awinegarduzett">Twitter</a> for livetweeting of the event. Crossposting today at <a href="http://www.rightosphere.com/home.php">Rightosphere</a> and <a href="http://conservativesforcongress.com">Conservatives4Congress</a>. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3876/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Channeling Reagan Pt. II-Rove&#8217;s Counsel of Compromise</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3144</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3144#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>j. austin russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=3144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent interview, Karl Rove paternally reminded conservative radicals&#8211;that is, conservatives who actually believe in something&#8211;that &#8220;not even Ronald Reagan will get a perfect score on a purity test.&#8221;  There he is again, Granddaddy Reagan, this time channeled by one of the mushy middle&#8217;s dogmatic champions.  Rove&#8217;s point seems to be that, since Reagan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34144.html">interview</a>, Karl Rove paternally reminded conservative radicals&#8211;that is, conservatives who actually believe in something&#8211;that &#8220;not even Ronald Reagan will get a perfect score on a purity test.&#8221;  There he is again, Granddaddy Reagan, this time channeled by one of the mushy middle&#8217;s dogmatic champions.  Rove&#8217;s point seems to be that, since Reagan would fail a purity test, conservatives should sit down, shut up, and accept the McCain/Bush/Socialist-Light candidates that his constituents in the GOP have been offering since Herbert Hoover.  What he fails to acknowledge is that this strategy of contenting ourselves with the lesser of two evils is to blame for the federal behemoth under which we currently live.  In the end, compromise on fundamental principles is nothing short of failure.  If America is to shake off the shackles of socialism with which it has bound itself, conservatives must begin to elect candidates that are actually conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/3144/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Government</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2943</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>j. austin russell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Efficient Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An article published last night in Politico bears the title “Reid woos Scott Brown on jobs bill”.  Scott Brown?  Jobs bill?  But isn’t the idea of a jobs bill&#8211;a cute name for more government subsidies and bailouts&#8211;diametrically opposed to the fundamental principles of the conservative movement?  If the answer is yes&#8211;and it is&#8211;one may be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/33089.html">article</a> published last night in Politico bears the title “Reid woos Scott Brown on jobs bill”.  Scott Brown?  Jobs bill?  But isn’t the idea of a jobs bill&#8211;a cute name for more government subsidies and bailouts&#8211;diametrically opposed to the fundamental principles of the conservative movement?  If the answer is yes&#8211;and it is&#8211;one may be left wondering if conservatism is totally opposed to government intervention in industries like education, healthcare, energy, finance, etc.  And what about welfare programs?  Does conservatism require that the government take a hands off approach to public charity?  While it is true that some conservatives disagree with any government interference that extends beyond defense, most would agree that local and state governments should take a very active role in regulating, subsidizing, and overseeing many industries.  What unites all conservatives, and defines the movement as a whole, rather, is the  simple axiom that the Federal Government should not involve itself in any social program.  Leave that stuff to the states, and limit the Federal Government to those powers articulated by the constitution, sans the erroneous meaning that modern poli-sci’s have applied (no, the regulation of commerce among the several states is not an infinite grant of power&#8211;it means exactly what it says and nothing more).  The result is a cleaner, greener government that does more on less.  In other words, if liberalism is the political equivalent of a twelve cylinder lamborghini, conservatism is a prius.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2943/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Personal Democracy Forum: The Future of the Conservative Movement</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1251</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1251#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 23:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick r brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Off Topic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech and Internet Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#pdf09]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Rasiej]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banah Boyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darth Vader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreePress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josh silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Micah Sifry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Wesch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monty Python]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Democracy Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tara Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whuffie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I?m sitting in a bar. These things must be qualified though, right? So I?m sitting in a sports bar.? Sports bars are particular entities of the bar world in that they have televisions with sports playing on them while they serve the spirits of the normal bar.? This isn?t to say that normal bars don?t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I?m sitting in a bar.</p>
<p>These things must be qualified though, right?</p>
<p>So I?m sitting in a sports bar.? Sports bars are particular entities of the bar world in that they have televisions with sports playing on them while they serve the spirits of the normal bar.? This isn?t to say that normal bars don?t show sports on their televisions.? It just means that they are normally called something that starts with ?Mc? and they have fewer televisions.</p>
<p>This particular sports bar has a sponsor.? It?s a Fox Sports Bar.? Not to be confused as Fox, sports bar.? But rather it is a Fox Sports, bar.</p>
<p>Like I said, these things must be qualified.? Also not to be confused with quantified, which would be to essentially count something.? And I?m pretty sure there is only one of me here and there is only one Fox Sports, bar present at this time.? But that could change depending on the terminal.</p>
<p>Ah, yes.? I?m in a terminal.? Not conditionally, but in the transitional sense.? In this case transferring myself to a plan, which has now been delayed two hours.? If you thought to yourself, ?Bummer,? it was an understatement because I was already two hours early to the original flight.</p>
<p>Bummer.</p>
<p>So I?m sitting in a Fox Sports, bar, that resides in a terminal that is a part of an airport for which I am awaiting a plane to board which will take me to Atlanta four hours from now.</p>
<p>I?m involved in all of this because I have recently, at the point of this writing, left the <a id="aptureLink_z0GHSPluGZ" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal%20Democracy%20Forum">Personal Democracy Forum Conference</a> of the year 2009.? Following day one of the event I was certainly frustrated.? There were a number of reasons for this.? For one, which <a href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1226" target="_blank">I?ve already mentioned</a>, I was beleaguered by the progressive presence.? Yes, we are all tech people at this conference and we all want to talk about the influence of tech on politics.? But there are certain things that, while all of that is true, tech people on the left and right just don?t see eye to eye.</p>
<p>For instance, <a id="aptureLink_8T9CYZWKrL" href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/23/gateway-neutrality-just-a-taste/">I do not want network neutrality regulated</a>. Period.? Tech proponents of such a step are short sighted.? Talk to someone who manages a large infrastructure.? They will tell you that network management of packet transfer must take place.? Good luck with the regulated network neutrality Internet when your whole neighborhood is trying to get time sensitive streaming 1080p video across your network at the same time and we have locked in regulation that will take ages to alter.? In the spirit of Monty Python, ?I laugh in your general direction.?? Is network neutrality important?? Absolutely.? I will not argue that point.? But regulated neutrality is an entirely different beast.</p>
<p>But I digress.</p>
<p>Panelists were over heard making the following comments:</p>
<p>?This is what we need to do to see ?progressive? health care reform.?</p>
<p>?We need to pray to god for a hot summer to make people believe that global warming is real.?</p>
<p>?The ?Bush? recession.?</p>
<p>Additionally all our problems were blamed on the Bush Administration.? Obviously our current problems are entirely his fault, along with Batman, Darth Vader, and probably God.</p>
<p>My point in bringing this up is that if the objective of PDF is to study the convergence of politics and technology, then let?s do that.? It doesn?t necessitate bringing ideology into the mix.</p>
<p><strong>I honestly believe that is what <a href="http://twitter.com/Rasiej" target="_blank">Andrew Rasiej</a> and co-Founder <a href="http://twitter.com/mlsif" target="_blank">Micah Sifry</a> are trying to do.</strong></p>
<p>I in no way believe there is an underlying motivation of promoting the ideals of the left.? And with that being said, heaps of praise must be bestowed on these two gentlemen for their fine work in putting together this conference since 2004.? It is interesting to consider the timing of this conference and the swelling online that began in Summer last year for Obama.? One must consider if more conservative presence (as in the attendees) was existent at last years event, how that may have altered the online dominance of the left during the election.? I don&#8217;t want to be ignorant enough to give PDF complete credit for what occurred.? But if 1000 people left the conference, and each one told 10 people, and those 10 people told 10 people&#8230;? You could see how easily the ball gets rolling.</p>
<p>The conference, all things considered, was a wonderful treat.? One that I would not have experienced without the Google Fellowship and PDF?s recognition of the work my fellow authors and I have done on this site, which I am of eternal gratitude.</p>
<p>The conference provided tremendous insight into developing web presence, establishing a bond and communication with your audience, and tools that can over night transform a site from drab to dapper.? The information of connecting with constituency and remodeling government websites to better connect and be more transparent with the citizenry is vital to the success of government in general and additionally vital to the revitalization of the <a id="aptureLink_HrQSmSPkCp" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GOP">GOP</a> and <a id="aptureLink_291JULyJZv" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical%20liberalism">conservatism</a> in general.</p>
<p>This is a conversation that I hope more conservatives take more seriously and can join in on in the future.? It is no secret that the left ignored talk radio early on and allowed the center-right to take a dominating lead.? One that is irrecoverable for the left, as multiple failed attempts with <a id="aptureLink_3YIQP8NVMw" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air%20America%20Radio">Air America</a> make astoundingly clear.? It should be very becoming very apparent to the right that if they ignore the convergence of technology and politics in the same arrogant manner that the left did to talk radio that at some point the strangle hold in the areas of internet technology and constituency connectivity will equally be unrecoverable.</p>
<p>Show stoppers:</p>
<p><strong>Best Moment:</strong> Finally hearing <a id="aptureLink_BF77RP9OvE" href="http://twitter.com/missrogue">Tara Hunt</a> explain live and in her own words what ?<a id="aptureLink_eS2kdt7D97" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qyFaWoiL6Cc">Whuffie</a>? is.? Equally great was getting to finally meet Tara after spending months <a id="aptureLink_TDtrwhCjIf" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter">Twitting</a> with her.</p>
<p><strong>Worst Moment:</strong> As mentioned in a previous column, the final panel of day one with <a id="aptureLink_f45uj3iVn3" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh%20Silver">Josh Silver</a>, Executive Director of <a id="aptureLink_FJDQFTOu9R" href="http://www.freepress.net/">FreePress</a>, was unbearably one sided.? Conservatives question the positions of telecoms as well.? But with no one there to present the center-right view on the future of telecommunications with regard to Internet regulation and expansion, the debate was completely one sided and a slaughter fest for Silver.? My memory may not be entirely accurate, but at one point I believe he rolled them over and actually stuck a fork in the gentlemen from Comcast &amp; AT&amp;T.</p>
<p><strong>My Jaw Dropped To The Floor And The Girl Next To Me With The Mac Had To Pick It Up For Me Award:</strong> Easily goes to <a id="aptureLink_3w9GajbefC" href="http://www.apture.com/">Apture</a>.? If you are running any sort of online content machine or blog and do not have this application installed you will without a doubt be left in the dust!? This app allows you to finally start linking to outside content without sending your readership away from your site, keeping them right where you want them to be; reading your material and clicking your ads.? If you haven&#8217;t noticed, it has already been seamlessly integrated into our site.</p>
<p><strong>Most Fun Presentation: </strong><a id="aptureLink_LACiFrYcUZ" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael%20Wesch">Michael Wesch</a>,<strong> </strong>The Machine is (Changing) Us: YouTube Culture and the Politics of Authenticity.</p>
<p><strong>Most Thought Provoking Presentation:</strong> <a id="aptureLink_ItaVNPYcrh" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danah%20boyd">Danah Boyd</a>, The Not-So-Hidden Politics of Class Online.</p>
<p>I want to encourage more conservatives to take this intersection more seriously, and see them next year at PDF 2010.</p>
<p>Thanks for a great conference.? I was very happy to be a part of the conversation!</p>
<p>-nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1251/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

