<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>thelobbyist &#187; American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/tag/american-recovery-and-reinvestment-act-of-2009/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:13:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Klien is Looking For a Sugar Daddy.</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/497</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/497#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rj caster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Klien of Time Magazine thinks thinks the American people are looking for a daddy figure.  This is what liberals find in President Obama.  Have we forgotten Madison's words of wisdom?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0   false false false        MicrosoftInternetExplorer4  &lt;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;   &lt;![endif]--><!--[if !mso]&gt;-->Well, I am unaware just how knowledgeable people are of myself and my beliefs, but I will begin by stating my political tendencies are geared toward the right, put mildly of course.<span> </span>Surprisingly enough, I enjoy a good episode of <em>Morning Joe</em> every day; a habit that cannot be beneficial to my heart health.<span> </span>Nonetheless, I listened <em>Time Magazine?s </em>Joe Klien explaining how the American people polled by CBS (because a flash poll conducted at 10:30pm on a weeknight of people who watched a liberal president?s liberal manifesto presentation wouldn?t have skewed results) showing 80% of Americans liked what they heard last night.<span> </span>Mr. Klien exclaims that the people are scared, they need a leader, and they are looking for a daddy in government.<span> </span>I would ask those educated individuals (whether or not you committed the <em>treasonous</em> act of dropping out of high school) to search the repository of their history books, and tell me what happened to a people?s freedoms when such sentiments were supposedly shared by the <em>volkgeist</em>.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I want to point out the danger behind such lines of thought.<span> </span>The public as of late has been ebbing and flowing with emotion.<span> </span>A dangerous situation as founder James Madison points out in the <em>Federalist Papers</em> where the ?tyranny of the majority? was pointed to as a real possibility in democracies.<span> </span>The United States has become increasingly apathetic, and today we are beginning to understand a true beginning of nihilism here on our soil.<span> </span>People did not vote based on their principles, they voted in the heat of the moment, to be a part of history, for an articulate leader instead of his ideas.<span> </span>When we stop being guided by our core beliefs, and begin to question everything our country has and continues to stand for, and then develop a mutual understanding that anyone can be right so in arguing your point you demonstrate old prejudices; we then become bewildered beasts in our own society.<span> </span>All it takes is for a situation to scare the people into looking into a man, or a <em>god</em>.<span> </span>Heidegger points out how a people will look for a ?superman? or god to lead them when they feel vulnerable.<span> </span>He would know after all.<span> </span>I do not mean to make any unfair comparisons, or be accused of <em>reducto ad Hitlerum;</em> however, if similarities exist, we would be derelict if we didn?t point this out.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Now we have President Obama.<span> </span>He is not Hitler, or a tyrant.<span> </span>Please do not misconstrue what I say as a mere <em>ad hominem</em> attack shallow in understanding.<span> </span>Can we please point out the fact that he is a mixture of the worst parts of our most liberal presidents?<span> </span>His ideas of an intellectual elite guiding us out opf the recession, and heading these bureaucracies reeks of Woodrow Wilson; his lack of understanding regarding the military, and promulgation of an argument to raise the number of troops and their pay and their benefits, but cutting the budget drastically; and the most lauded comparison with F.D.R. and his misguided belief that radical spending will drive the US out of an economic recession.<span> </span>Adding short term ?infrastructure? projects to rebuild roads and schools and anything else? where does someone who was a part of the 52,000 Citi employees fit in to that?<span> </span>After having worked as an IT recruiter for years, I cannot understand how an IT recruiter today finds a way to place his .Net Developer on a new project that involved re-paving I-495.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>There are myriad particulars in President Obama?s speech last night that we can argue against.<span> </span>That would take more time than I have currently, and I have bored you enough as it is.<span> </span>I would point out the <em>one</em> thing people said the President needed to do in order to have a successful speech; instill confidence.<span> </span>Well the Dow is down 150 points.<span> </span>I will let the events pass final judgment on the level of success.<span> </span>And I would hope that MSNBC has tissues in their preparation rooms for their guest, to wipe the brown residue off their noses.<span> </span>No wonder they can?t smell how bad this stinks.<span> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/497/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Broadband Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/207</link>
		<comments>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/207#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 18:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nick r brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/?p=207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had another post go up on openmarket.org regarding the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, specifically the section on broadband stimulus. $6 Billion For Broadband, Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And LOL At The Recovery Act -nick]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had another post go up on openmarket.org regarding the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, specifically the section on broadband stimulus.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.openmarket.org/2009/01/16/6-billion-for-broadband-or-how-i-learned-to-stop-worrying-and-lol-at-the-recovery-act/" target="_blank">$6 Billion For Broadband, Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And LOL At The Recovery Act</a></p>
<p>-nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/207/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
