BEFORE You Pass the Unemployment Extension!

Unemployment is the new-old hot button issue that is all over the news again since we finally corked the oil spill in the Gulf for the time being. This is also a topic that affects far more Americans directly, so naturally, it is back on the front burner before Congress takes their August recess.  Today it is looking like we are going to get the extension passed without any consideration for how it will be paid for, or what it will even accomplish.

There is one talking point I would like clarified by our friends on the left: has the stimulus been successful, or are we in a dire situation? We cannot have it both ways, and yet, President Obama and his cabinet would like you to believe that the stimulus was successful while at the same time lecturing the Republicans on the reasonableness of passing the unemployment extension because we are in a crisis (and God knows, this Administration won’t let any crisis go to waste!). You can’t have your cake and eat it too, although, we are supposed to eat ours.

So which is it? Those of us with a more Conservative (or rugged individualism) proclivity are likely to say, “a year for unemployment benefits is ample time! Suck it up and get a job!” Those of us who may be more mindful of taking care of our fellow man (or, at least forcing others to do so through government so we don’t have to do the dirty work ourselves) might argue, “there are no jobs, what are they supposed to do?”

Taking only one side of this issue leaves one without a complete understanding of our present crisis’ gestalt. There are certainly a number of situations where people have been using unemployment benefits to subsidize their sloth; while one cannot take away from the fact that some areas of a state simply have no infrastructure for job growth. You cannot deny that the job situation has gotten worse, the New York Times has an interactive map that shows the growing unemployment rates state by state and how they climbed over time. Furthermore, the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not show a particularly peachy picture of jobs to come, considering at the present moment there are five Americans competing for every one job.

I know it won’t happen, but there are two things I would like to see done if Congress and the President are to pass the Emergency Unemployment Benefits Extension:

First, I cannot imagine why we can’t find a way to pay for it. Emergency unemployment benefits are not paid by the employer during the worker’s tenure, it comes straight out of thin air thanks to the Federal government’s Nietzschean ability to posit something from nothing; in this case, create money and with it, value. The Federal government sets aside a block grant to the state, whose Department of Labor hands out the benefits accordingly. Our Federal deficit stands at a paltry $1.6 Trillion dollars this year, as projected by the administration. The Unemployment bill that is set to pass today will add yet another $36 Billion to our gluttonous budget, and all the Republicans and a few Blue-Dogs ask for is a means to pay for it… part of it? Half of it? Any of it? Somebody please go to YouCut and find one of those programs that Representative Cantor’s office has bulls-eyed and we could have this extension paid for.

Secondly, I’ve already hinted to it earlier in the piece, but the Wall Street Journal has an article about stimulating unemployment where a crazy correlation was made: “A 2006 NBER study by Raj Chetty of UC Berkeley on a related subject begins, ‘It is well known that unemployment benefits raise unemployment durations.’” Imagine that: incentivizing people to not get jobs, and then telling them “well instead of getting a job call your Congressman and ask him or her to extend unemployment benefits” would lead people to strive for nothing. That’s as stupid as setting time-tables in a war. Nevertheless, if we are going to do this last emergency extension, why the hell would we not get something out of it in return? Why not ask of people (and I say ask now, but rather, I’d be much more willing to demand it as part of the prerequisite for receiving such benefits) to help out their community? I would make it mandatory for people to volunteer at least 20 hours of their week towards their community, state or nation in exchange for their free benefits (because we must remember, that they did not pay into this unemployment pool). This would allow people to create at least some value from their benefits outside of paying for the bare necessities that had to be paid for already. Giving money away doesn’t add value; but giving money to people in exchange for something does.

When I mentioned this on my Twitter account (follow me, rcaster – we are not afraid of shameless self promotion here) I was accosted by some #P2 fellow, which means he is a “Progressive” in Twitter lexicon. He claimed my idea was unfair because “the unemployed are not criminals!” I would have re-posted the conversation for you, but BlackJedi”somethingorother” was embarrassed enough to just erase his entire end of the conversation, and my tweets went as well (I guess that means I was blocked).

Imagine that, doing something for your community is an activity that should be relegated to those people who are being punished. Perhaps this is the truth about the soul of our communities, and why liberal areas tend to lack it. Doing community service is a punishment? Well I would rather bestow benefits upon people willing to contribute to their community, than give it to those who do not. And besides, who can take away the fact that people will feel better once they get into a productive groove; perhaps they will put their rear-into-gear afterward and go look for that next job with some new skills; perhaps they won’t sit around and feel sorry for themselves, but feel a sense of accomplishment for having achieved something, and that may just be the push they need to go out the door and apply. I used to get into arguments with my high school history teacher, Mr. Lubenetski, about FDR’s New Deal and whether or not it ended the Great Depression. He would say to me, looking exactly like Teddy Roosevelt (he did, red hair, mustache, glasses and all) and explode with his booming voice, “it may not have brought people all the way up to their feet, but it kept them off their knees!” If we are going to pay people who lost work, I say we put them back to work, because you may not be able to measure the benefit of doing so, but a man’s pride can carry him further than his pouting ever will.

-rj

Comments

2 Responses to “BEFORE You Pass the Unemployment Extension!”
  1. Sebastian says:

    All money, by its very nature is Nietzschean by your definition. The greenback has no intrinsic value and, really, never has. Gold, which Fox News loves to advertise for as that end all and be all for value is mostly worthless unless you’re making wires. I mean seriously, what value does that extremely malleable, shiny metal hold for people should a cataclysm occur? It has value only because enough people declare it so, not from any inherent usefulness it has.
    Also, mandatory community service? Great idea, Stalin. It sounds an awful lot like FDR’s programs though: create money and demand for labor and then employ the unemployed to build infrastructure (community service). Also, besides for a bunch of wishful thinking, can you provide any evidence that people will do anything remotely resembling what you’re proposing once they have jobs?
    This article puts a bunch of facts together and then wildly leaps to conclusions and then declares them related (I suspect by virtue of the fact they’re in the same post together). I rate it a C. It adequately informs a reader about many facts on the topic without providing any rational insight derived from those facts.

    • RJ says:

      Sebastian, I am, of course, appreciative of your response. However, I wish you had kept them more meaningful with regard to policy and the topic at hand, and less about grasping at straws for something to criticize, while giving lack-luster support for those criticisms.
      So you decided the most important thing to spend a paragraph on is my smart-assed quip about creating value (or wealth) out of thin air. That is what we have been doing to try and combat the loss of value in our currency and economy. Gold, however, has held a value far longer than the greenback, so yes, though gold is useless until we posit a value to it, but it is more valuable inherently than dollars or Euros. Thanks for the worthless digression.
      Mandatory community service, yes Sebastian, if you receive Teir V unemployment benefits that you did not pay into. Stalin? So everyone who is expected to work for a paycheck is at the mercy of a “Stalin”. Reductio ad Stalinum now? It is an awful lot like FDR’s programs. Please tell me where we are better off just giving away free money for 99 weeks, instead of getting some sort of investment out of it? That’s jumping to a wild conclusion?
      As for your wishful thinking point: I cannot even figure out what your criticism is here. Wishful thinking? Don’t we wish thinks will work out from our plans? The point of the article was to state that if people are receiving extended benefits, they can do a little work. It’s not a job, and they stop when they get a real job.
      I am of the opinion that the article lays out a fairly good argument for why we should tie extended benefits with some form of community service for the betterment of everyone involved, including the community; as well as creating value in one way or another. I am afraid, you failed to read the article thoroughly, otherwise you certainly would have given me better than a C. Nevertheless, C’s means degrees…

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!