<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Panick Yet- Healthcare Reform Still Needs Senate Passage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2072/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2072</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 18:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Panick Yet- Healthcare Reform Still Needs Senate Passage &#8230; &#171; jeremysrandomblog</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2072/comment-page-1#comment-3558</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Panick Yet- Healthcare Reform Still Needs Senate Passage &#8230; &#171; jeremysrandomblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2072#comment-3558</guid>
		<description>[...] Democrats need 60 out of 100 votes in the Senate, not the 50%+1 (or 218) necessary in the House of Representatives , and assuming all Republicans oppose the bill, even just one of the three Senators listed above voting with Republicans &#8230;Read More [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democrats need 60 out of 100 votes in the Senate, not the 50%+1 (or 218) necessary in the House of Representatives , and assuming all Republicans oppose the bill, even just one of the three Senators listed above voting with Republicans &#8230;Read More [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democrat Wants Abortion In Health Care Bill &#124; thelobbyist</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2072/comment-page-1#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>Democrat Wants Abortion In Health Care Bill &#124; thelobbyist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2072#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>[...] about the mandate, higher taxes and? the soon-to-be not-optional public option? ? Fortunately, as I wrote yesterday, the final bill will be much more moderate than Wasserman would like. Specifically, neither [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about the mandate, higher taxes and? the soon-to-be not-optional public option? ? Fortunately, as I wrote yesterday, the final bill will be much more moderate than Wasserman would like. Specifically, neither [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News In NH</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/2072/comment-page-1#comment-3541</link>
		<dc:creator>race42008.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; News In NH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=2072#comment-3541</guid>
		<description>[...] and a plug for a piece I wrote about why we shouldn&#8217;t panic quite yet about the disastrous House health care reform plan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and a plug for a piece I wrote about why we shouldn&#8217;t panic quite yet about the disastrous House health care reform plan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

