<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Hampshire Looks Strong For Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1844/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1844</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 18:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Politico as of October 25, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</title>
		<link>http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1844/comment-page-1#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Politico as of October 25, 2009 &#187; The Daily Parr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1844#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>[...] as ineffective and as a distraction from more important issues ? all of which may be true.   New Hampshire Looks Strong For Republicans &#8211; thelobbyist.net 10/25/2009 This was originally published at http://race42008.com/ New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as ineffective and as a distraction from more important issues ? all of which may be true.   New Hampshire Looks Strong For Republicans &#8211; thelobbyist.net 10/25/2009 This was originally published at <a href="http://race42008.com/" rel="nofollow">http://race42008.com/</a> New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

