Comments on: Fox News vs. Everyone Else http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745 Mon, 02 May 2011 18:06:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: olqqjo http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745/comment-page-1#comment-3570 olqqjo Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:41:42 +0000 http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1745#comment-3570 d4NZe5 <a href="http://xjswepgvxuxf.com/" rel="nofollow">xjswepgvxuxf</a>, [url=http://kcyevodzcemk.com/]kcyevodzcemk[/url], [link=http://kraqdtwnompb.com/]kraqdtwnompb[/link], http://pwxyrodarotl.com/ d4NZe5 xjswepgvxuxf, [url=http://kcyevodzcemk.com/]kcyevodzcemk[/url], [link=http://kraqdtwnompb.com/]kraqdtwnompb[/link], http://pwxyrodarotl.com/

]]> By: Have Treasury Officials Ever Had A Real Job? | thelobbyist http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745/comment-page-1#comment-3568 Have Treasury Officials Ever Had A Real Job? | thelobbyist Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:36:17 +0000 http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1745#comment-3568 [...] into doing a better job, Treasury will publish a list in December of those that are lagging.” First they came after Limbaugh, then after Cramer, then AIG and Fox. Now they are coming after mortgage companies. Whatever [...] [...] into doing a better job, Treasury will publish a list in December of those that are lagging.” First they came after Limbaugh, then after Cramer, then AIG and Fox. Now they are coming after mortgage companies. Whatever [...]

]]> By: Weekly Team-Up: Dobbs & Fox A Match Made for Democrats? | thelobbyist http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745/comment-page-1#comment-3545 Weekly Team-Up: Dobbs & Fox A Match Made for Democrats? | thelobbyist Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:18:24 +0000 http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1745#comment-3545 [...] We have to ask once more: is?this a good thing? Sure, it’s great for Fox News Network and its profits, but is it good to be pulling all conservative influence from the other networks? Check out Dustin’s articles on this?here?and here. [...] [...] We have to ask once more: is?this a good thing? Sure, it’s great for Fox News Network and its profits, but is it good to be pulling all conservative influence from the other networks? Check out Dustin’s articles on this?here?and here. [...]

]]> By: RJ http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745/comment-page-1#comment-3486 RJ Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:06:52 +0000 http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1745#comment-3486 I think this is the very tip of a much larger Iceberg (not the lettuce, if the President is easedropping, he prefers arugula). The media has been doing what common sense helped us observe in the High School lunch rooms: birds of a feather flock together. People inherently clump into groups where something is shared. What's funny, is that there has been a long-standing bias in the news media and its left-leaning stances on issues. Nevertheless, the left-leaning was just that, leaning. Now we have people acting like iron fillings being attracted to opposing poles of a magnet, which is occuring predominately in the Cable News sphere. The broader problem that is coming from this, is that we have fewer Batchelors, Wills, Krauthammers, et cetera: and far more Becks, Savages, and other more bellicose public figures. But are there more? Or do they just have more visibilty because of how open and quick-flowing information and the news cycle has become? What's funny, is that they demons are created by the very people who clame to loathe them, because they continue to shed light and attention on every single comment made that is out of line or beyond tact. I think this is the very tip of a much larger Iceberg (not the lettuce, if the President is easedropping, he prefers arugula). The media has been doing what common sense helped us observe in the High School lunch rooms: birds of a feather flock together. People inherently clump into groups where something is shared. What’s funny, is that there has been a long-standing bias in the news media and its left-leaning stances on issues. Nevertheless, the left-leaning was just that, leaning. Now we have people acting like iron fillings being attracted to opposing poles of a magnet, which is occuring predominately in the Cable News sphere.

The broader problem that is coming from this, is that we have fewer Batchelors, Wills, Krauthammers, et cetera: and far more Becks, Savages, and other more bellicose public figures. But are there more? Or do they just have more visibilty because of how open and quick-flowing information and the news cycle has become? What’s funny, is that they demons are created by the very people who clame to loathe them, because they continue to shed light and attention on every single comment made that is out of line or beyond tact.

]]> By: Posts about Rush Limbaugh as of October 13, 2009 » The Daily Parr http://thelobbyist.net/lobby/archives/1745/comment-page-1#comment-3484 Posts about Rush Limbaugh as of October 13, 2009 » The Daily Parr Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:34:55 +0000 http://thelobbyist.net/?p=1745#comment-3484 [...] about Rush Limbaugh as of October 13, 2009 President Obama Helps Fox News By Targeting It – thelobbyist.net 10/13/2009 A few weeks ago, after it was announced that John Stossel was [...] [...] about Rush Limbaugh as of October 13, 2009 President Obama Helps Fox News By Targeting It – thelobbyist.net 10/13/2009 A few weeks ago, after it was announced that John Stossel was [...]

]]>